<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Risk Strategies &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com</link>
	<description>Published by Paul E. Paray</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:00:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Data Privacy Day 2012</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/data-privacy-day-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/data-privacy-day-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=1026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deserving of a fairly large yawn, the International Data Privacy Day came on a Saturday this year.  The US sponsors &#8212; who are basically large tech companies &#8212; can hardly be faulted for failing to elevate today to true holiday status.   In Europe, the festivities are equally lame.  Last year, it was not much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/data-privacy-day-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU Data Breach Notification in 24 Hours?</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/eu-data-breach-notification-in-24-hours/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/eu-data-breach-notification-in-24-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 25, 2012, the European Union will announce a comprehensive reform of its data protection rules.  This proposed shift will likely toughen existing data-protection requirements and, according to one published report, will include a new rule requiring companies to disclose data breaches within 24 hours of the breach &#8211; in effect leapfrogging the toughest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/eu-data-breach-notification-in-24-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third Circuit Agrees Standing is Lacking in Breach Case</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/third-circuit-agrees-standing-lacking-in-breach-case/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/third-circuit-agrees-standing-lacking-in-breach-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 03:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Reilly v. Ceridian Corporation, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24561, 3 (3d Cir., December 12, 2011), found that “allegations of an increased risk of identity theft resulting from a security breach” were insufficient to secure Article III standing.  In so doing, the court affirmed the dismissal of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/third-circuit-agrees-standing-lacking-in-breach-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico City Redux:  Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/mexico-city-redux-conference-of-data-protection-and-privacy-commissioners/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/mexico-city-redux-conference-of-data-protection-and-privacy-commissioners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 2 – 3, 2011, about 600 persons from around the world attended the 33rd International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners.   For those unable to make the trek to Mexico City, what follows is selected insight gained from several folks who attended and were kind enough to report back what was discussed in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/mexico-city-redux-conference-of-data-protection-and-privacy-commissioners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Circuit Rules Hannaford Damages Include ID Theft Insurance and Card Reissuance Fees</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/first-circuit-rules-on-hannaford-damages-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/first-circuit-rules-on-hannaford-damages-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 20, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion reversing a Maine District Court&#8217;s dismissal of negligence and implied contract claims against grocer Hannaford Brothers.  The underlying data breach publicly announced on March 17, 2008 by Hannaford led to a consolidated class action that was ultimately rejected in its entirety by the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/first-circuit-rules-on-hannaford-damages-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZIP Code Litigation Update</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/zip-code-litigation-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/zip-code-litigation-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year, the California Supreme Court ruled on the outer reach of a state statute meant to protect consumers during credit card transactions – the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971.  See Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., 51 Cal. 4th 524 (2011).  Specifically, Song-Beverly precludes retailers from requesting and recording a customer’s “personal identification [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/zip-code-litigation-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ponemon Second Annual Cost of Cybercrime Study</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/ponemon-second-annual-cost-of-cyber-crime-study/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/ponemon-second-annual-cost-of-cyber-crime-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A detailed study regarding the impact of cybercrime on corporations was recently released by the Ponemon Institute.  According to the Second Annual Cost of Cyber Crime Study, the median annualized cost of cybercrime incurred by a benchmark sampling of organizations was $5.9 million per year, with a range of $1.5 million to $36.5 million each [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/ponemon-second-annual-cost-of-cyber-crime-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NJ Court Rules No Privacy Tort Exists for Location Tracking</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/nj-court-rules-no-privacy-tort-exists-for-location-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/nj-court-rules-no-privacy-tort-exists-for-location-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what may be a case of first impression, the New Jersey Appellate Division ruled, on July 7, 2011, that the tort of invasion of privacy does not necessarily exist whenever a plaintiff alleges surreptitious location tracking by a defendant.  Specifically, the court ruled: We hold that the placement of a GPS device in plaintiff&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/nj-court-rules-no-privacy-tort-exists-for-location-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Betterley Report on Cyber Insurance is Now Available</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/betterley-report-on-cyber-insurance-is-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/betterley-report-on-cyber-insurance-is-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 10:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The highly-anticipated annual Betterley Report on cyber insurance was released right before the 4th of July holiday weekend.  In the free summary of the issue, there is mention of the 29 insurers now providing some form of network security and privacy insurance.  Betterley projects the existing market to be in the $800 million range &#8212; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/betterley-report-on-cyber-insurance-is-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round Four of The Personal Data Privacy and Security Act</title>
		<link>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/round-four-of-the-personal-data-privacy-and-security-act/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/round-four-of-the-personal-data-privacy-and-security-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 02:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul E. Paray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/?p=837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 7, 2011, Senator Patrick Leahy introduced &#8220;The Personal Data Privacy and Security Act&#8221; &#8212; the fourth time he has introduced this particular piece of legislation.  According to the senator&#8217;s press release, the law would &#8221;establish a national standard for data breach notification, and require American businesses that collect and store consumers’ sensitive personal information [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.digitalriskstrategies.com/round-four-of-the-personal-data-privacy-and-security-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

